{
  "annotation_id": "f804317d-3fea-45fe-a679-02961173a120",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:23.791000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:23.791000Z",
  "file_hash": "43dd65b0aeacc43cea44740e81a30ca85dcad3c17650b07d170247841c2d082e",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The support of Copenhagen quantum mechanics in the discussion concerning EPR\nexperiments has been based fundamentally on two mistakes. First, quantum\nmechanics as well as hidden-variable theory give the same predictions; the\nstatement of Belinfante from 1973 about the significant difference must be\ndenoted as mistake. Secondly, the experimental violation of Bell\u0027s inequalities\nhas been erroneously interpreted as excluding the hidden-variable alternative,\nwhile they have been based on assumption corresponding to classical physics.\nThe EPR experiments cannot bring, therefore, any decision in the controversy\nbetween Einstein and Bohr. However, the view of Einstein is strongly supported\nby experimental results concerning the light transmission through three\npolarizers.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0601015",
    "authors": [
      "Milos V. Lokajicek"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Controversy between Einstein and Bohr and two erroneous arguments used   in supporting Copenhagen quantum mechanics",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0601015"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "b288e423-15e2-4170-9aba-e8cb0f8079ae",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}