dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaComment on ``Validity of certain soft-photon amplitudes''
| Authors | M. K. Liou, R. Timmermans, B. F. Gibson, Y. Li |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | nucl-th/9703060 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9703060 |
| DOI | 10.1103/PhysRevC.60.039801 |
| Journal | Phys.Rev. C60 (1999) 039801 |
Abstract
The criteria suggested by Welsh and Fearing (nucl-th/9606040) to judge the validity of certain soft-photon amplitudes are examined. We comment on aspects of their analysis which lead to incorrect conclusions about published amplitudes and point out important criteria which were omitted from their analysis.
{
"annotation_id": "f3dfcb06-5be8-49af-8bf1-f9725edf413d",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:18.571000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:18.571000Z",
"file_hash": "cc8e0a47b72ff93245fbdec7e618811906d2121ebaa5de6b4d2c9bb8d8f18651",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "The criteria suggested by Welsh and Fearing (nucl-th/9606040) to judge the\nvalidity of certain soft-photon amplitudes are examined. We comment on aspects\nof their analysis which lead to incorrect conclusions about published\namplitudes and point out important criteria which were omitted from their\nanalysis.",
"arxiv_id": "nucl-th/9703060",
"authors": [
"M. K. Liou",
"R. Timmermans",
"B. F. Gibson",
"Y. Li"
],
"categories": [
"nucl-th"
],
"doi": "10.1103/PhysRevC.60.039801",
"journal_ref": "Phys.Rev. C60 (1999) 039801",
"title": "Comment on ``Validity of certain soft-photon amplitudes\u0027\u0027",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9703060"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "60048d0f-9527-4a22-ab7e-0295b1b3e593",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}