dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaEinstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon
| Authors | Asher Peres |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/0310010 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0310010 |
Abstract
The EPR paradox (1935) is reexamined in the light of Shannon's information theory (1948). The EPR argument did not take into account that the observers' information was localized, like any other physical object.
{
"annotation_id": "f1e1e4f8-47a9-4c4d-b9b4-e5137508cd21",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:03.351000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:03.351000Z",
"file_hash": "119e372cada3a6794b988a4800324f23dc2c3b4ae6a5c184bc908c37cdfbebce",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "The EPR paradox (1935) is reexamined in the light of Shannon\u0027s information\ntheory (1948). The EPR argument did not take into account that the observers\u0027\ninformation was localized, like any other physical object.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0310010",
"authors": [
"Asher Peres"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph"
],
"title": "Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0310010"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "adc96bcc-a51c-4f3e-a50e-5f8d01b0c5d9",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}