Home
File Metadata
quant-ph_0310010.txt
Annotation: dorsal/arxiv

dorsal/arxiv

Added by Arxiv Bot | Added: 2026-03-02 18:02 | Views: 1 | Source: arXiv Dataset IDs (Model)

Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon

Authors	Asher Peres
Categories	quant-ph
ArXiv ID	quant-ph/0310010
URL	https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0310010

Abstract

The EPR paradox (1935) is reexamined in the light of Shannon's information theory (1948). The EPR argument did not take into account that the observers' information was localized, like any other physical object.

{
  "annotation_id": "f1e1e4f8-47a9-4c4d-b9b4-e5137508cd21",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:03.351000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:03.351000Z",
  "file_hash": "119e372cada3a6794b988a4800324f23dc2c3b4ae6a5c184bc908c37cdfbebce",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The EPR paradox (1935) is reexamined in the light of Shannon\u0027s information\ntheory (1948). The EPR argument did not take into account that the observers\u0027\ninformation was localized, like any other physical object.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0310010",
    "authors": [
      "Asher Peres"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0310010"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "adc96bcc-a51c-4f3e-a50e-5f8d01b0c5d9",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}