dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaCultural Compass: A Framework for Organizing Societal Norms to Detect Violations in Human-AI Conversations
| Authors | Myra Cheng, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Alice Oh, Hayk Stepanyan, Aishwarya Verma, Charu Kalia, Erin MacMurray van Liemt, Sunipa Dev |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | 2601.07973vv1 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07973 |
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Abstract
Generative AI models ought to be useful and safe across cross-cultural contexts. One critical step toward this goal is understanding how AI models adhere to sociocultural norms. While this challenge has gained attention in NLP, existing work lacks both nuance and coverage in understanding and evaluating models' norm adherence. We address these gaps by introducing a taxonomy of norms that clarifies their contexts (e.g., distinguishing between human-human norms that models should recognize and human-AI interactional norms that apply to the human-AI interaction itself), specifications (e.g., relevant domains), and mechanisms (e.g., modes of enforcement). We demonstrate how our taxonomy can be operationalized to automatically evaluate models' norm adherence in naturalistic, open-ended settings. Our exploratory analyses suggest that state-of-the-art models frequently violate norms, though violation rates vary by model, interactional context, and country. We further show that violation rates also vary by prompt intent and situational framing. Our taxonomy and demonstrative evaluation pipeline enable nuanced, context-sensitive evaluation of cultural norm adherence in realistic settings.
{
"annotation_id": "ee28f9d6-74e8-4aef-885f-a3cbd49f6e5b",
"date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:15.039000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:15.039000Z",
"file_hash": "8fb37c7774a36a5224841f8eab02a7be11d2dd72c3d821a537c329291f2248ba",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "Generative AI models ought to be useful and safe across cross-cultural contexts. One critical step toward this goal is understanding how AI models adhere to sociocultural norms. While this challenge has gained attention in NLP, existing work lacks both nuance and coverage in understanding and evaluating models\u0027 norm adherence. We address these gaps by introducing a taxonomy of norms that clarifies their contexts (e.g., distinguishing between human-human norms that models should recognize and human-AI interactional norms that apply to the human-AI interaction itself), specifications (e.g., relevant domains), and mechanisms (e.g., modes of enforcement). We demonstrate how our taxonomy can be operationalized to automatically evaluate models\u0027 norm adherence in naturalistic, open-ended settings. Our exploratory analyses suggest that state-of-the-art models frequently violate norms, though violation rates vary by model, interactional context, and country. We further show that violation rates also vary by prompt intent and situational framing. Our taxonomy and demonstrative evaluation pipeline enable nuanced, context-sensitive evaluation of cultural norm adherence in realistic settings.",
"arxiv_id": "2601.07973",
"authors": [
"Myra Cheng",
"Vinodkumar Prabhakaran",
"Alice Oh",
"Hayk Stepanyan",
"Aishwarya Verma",
"Charu Kalia",
"Erin MacMurray van Liemt",
"Sunipa Dev"
],
"categories": [
"cs.CY",
"cs.AI",
"cs.CL"
],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"title": "Cultural Compass: A Framework for Organizing Societal Norms to Detect Violations in Human-AI Conversations",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07973",
"version": "v1"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "c8f141be-e876-48bc-916d-fe178a9c4100",
"id": "arXiv Dataset",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}