dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaL'argument Einstein Podolsky Rosen (EPR) : Paradoxe, Alternative, Demonstration
| Authors | Pierre Roussel |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/0308170 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0308170 |
Abstract
The EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) argument and the Schrodinger cat paradox are revisited in relation with modern quantum optics and atomic physics and with the concept of decoherence. It is shown that the questions raised fifty years ago are still at the heart of our understanding of quantum physics today.
{
"annotation_id": "ec1935e4-8647-44bd-b31b-692dfa63840a",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:03.117000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:03.117000Z",
"file_hash": "54bf6e196672cea132ccdcb07442d00b81055b17e022c524a90a51dfa1f7072b",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "The EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) argument and the Schrodinger cat paradox\nare revisited in relation with modern quantum optics and atomic physics and\nwith the concept of decoherence. It is shown that the questions raised fifty\nyears ago are still at the heart of our understanding of quantum physics today.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0308170",
"authors": [
"Pierre Roussel"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph"
],
"title": "L\u0027argument Einstein Podolsky Rosen (EPR) : Paradoxe, Alternative, Demonstration",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0308170"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "7e6d91c3-5d75-4f13-986a-71ae281b51bf",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}