{
  "annotation_id": "ebd3950b-fb75-485b-9c67-5769d318839e",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:52.425000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:52.425000Z",
  "file_hash": "6ec63a72be5f3e3ab509248cecba6bc98787e2a84704f3c9f3f8b153c28d0b8e",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We analyse notion of independence in the EPR-Bohm framework by using\ncomparative analysis of independence in conventional and frequency probability\ntheories. Such an analysis is important to demonstrate that Bell\u0027s inequality\nwas obtained by using totally unjustified assumptions (e.g. the\nBell-Clauser-Horne factorability condition). Our frequency analysis also\ndemonstrated that Gill-Weihs-Zeilinger-Zukowski\u0027s arguments based on \"the\nexperimenter\u0027s freedom to choose settings\" to support the standard Bell\napproach are neither justified by the structure of the EPR-Bohm experiment.\nFinally, our analysis supports the original Einstein\u0027s viewpoint that quantum\nmechanics is simply not complete.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0205081",
    "authors": [
      "Andrei Khrennikov"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.4006/1.3025575",
    "title": "Event-independence, collective-independence,EPR-Bohm experiment and   incompleteness of quantum mechanics",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0205081"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "003a391e-0e95-48e4-96e0-6390bd976483",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}