{
  "annotation_id": "e9bd04c4-4336-4a92-abed-2f27d8abe9c4",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:13.568000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:13.568000Z",
  "file_hash": "8245e5857f77421a4df63d75da4a5c1c5200644204287b58d984d8ab139a983c",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We study the relation between local unitary (LU) equivalence and local\nClifford (LC) equivalence of stabilizer states. We introduce a large subclass\nof stabilizer states, such that every two LU equivalent states in this class\nare necessarily LC equivalent. Together with earlier results, this shows that\nLC, LU and SLOCC equivalence are the same notions for this class of stabilizer\nstates. Moreover, recognizing whether two given stabilizer states in the\npresent subclass are locally equivalent only requires a polynomial number of\noperations in the number of qubits.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0411115",
    "authors": [
      "M. Van den Nest",
      "J. Dehaene",
      "B. De Moor"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062323",
    "journal_ref": "Phys. Rev. A 71, 062323 (2005)",
    "title": "Local unitary versus local Clifford equivalence of stabilizer states",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0411115"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "7a843881-eeea-474c-be44-0e90dbd9931d",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}