{
  "annotation_id": "e84dbf30-dbca-4290-9ef7-96e4926f5a90",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:10.524000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:10.524000Z",
  "file_hash": "411575dbe816157febc31fd674ad971d6b105547e490a5744dc4397d1b4645e7",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "TeV center of mass energy lepton-hadron collider is necessary both to clarify\nfundamental aspects of strong interactions and for adequate interpretation of\nthe LHC data. Recently proposed QCD Explorer utilizes the energy advantage of\nthe LHC proton and ion beams, which allows the usage of relatively low energy\nelectron beam. Two options for the LHC based ep collider are posibble:\nconstruction of a new electron ring in the LHC tunnel or construction of an\ne-linac tangentially to the LHC. In the latter case, which seems more\nacceptable for a number of reasons, two options are under consideration for\nelectron linac: the CLIC technology allows shorter linac length, whereas TESLA\ntechnology gives higher luminosity.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0608288",
    "authors": [
      "H. Karadeniz",
      "S. Sultansoy"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.acc-ph",
      "hep-ex",
      "hep-ph",
      "nucl-ex",
      "physics.ins-det"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "Conf.Proc.C060626:673-675,2006",
    "title": "QCD Explorer Proposal: E-Linac Versus E-Ring",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608288"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "41e02676-9047-4794-a420-0e26747061b6",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}