{
  "annotation_id": "e6fec95f-19b9-4e20-94b6-5563b297e36b",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:27.733000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:27.733000Z",
  "file_hash": "a05f8d2783536e7e332d737870fa4cbd2e76a3b37d283b1850f81cfe5a27c68a",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We analyze optical EPR experimental data performed by Weihs et al in\nInnsbruck 1997-1998. We show that for some linear combinations of the raw\ncoincidence rates, the experimental results display some anomalous behavior\nthat a more general source state (like non-maximally entangled state) cannot\nstraightforwardly account for. We attempt to explain these anomalies by taking\naccount of the relative efficiencies of the four channels. For this purpose, we\nuse the fair sampling assumption, and assume explicitly that the detection\nefficiencies for the pairs of entangled photons can be written as a product of\nthe two corresponding detection efficiencies for the single photons. We show\nthat this explicit use of fair sampling cannot be maintained to be a reasonable\nassumption as it leads to an apparent violation of the no-signalling principle.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0606122",
    "authors": [
      "Guillaume Adenier",
      "Andrei Yu. Khrennikov"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1088/0953-4075/40/1/012",
    "journal_ref": "J. Phys. B 40 No 1 (2007) 131-141",
    "title": "Is the Fair Sampling Assumption supported by EPR Experiments?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0606122"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "9f831063-1cd9-4a24-8308-bba8fdd3f431",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}