{
  "annotation_id": "e1433cee-c561-4bbc-b200-bfe0dcbe1f10",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:30.494000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:30.494000Z",
  "file_hash": "e8cb086721c5eff235ad2a5fc4aeeaf392424f52fe1b910da012f5a90d4d24fc",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We comment on a recent paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 070401 (2006):\nquant-ph/0603229] concerning rubidium atoms trapped near a superconducting\nniobium surface at ~4K. This seeks to calculate the rate of atomic spin flips\ninduced by thermal magnetic noise. We point out that the calculation is in\nerror by a large factor because it is based on the two-fluid model of\nsuperconductivity. This model gives a poor description of electromagnetic\ndissipation just below the critical temperature because it cannot incorporate\nthe case II coherences of a fuller quantum theory.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0610095",
    "authors": [
      "Stefan Scheel",
      "E. A. Hinds",
      "P. L. Knight"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Comment on `Spin Decoherence in Superconducting Atom Chips\u0027",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610095"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "3f8f015d-7614-440e-8016-f05352820ec3",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}