{
  "annotation_id": "ddb8f433-47e3-4ff0-b2fd-2320703ddcb7",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:37.878000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:37.878000Z",
  "file_hash": "94081dc86c13f7c681ef3c44406c66e865ed5abf9102d5e291b0b17c840e186d",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Recent work with Dowker on the scientific status of the consistent histories\napproach to quantum theory is reviewed and summarised. The approach is compared\nwith formulations of quantum theory, such as Bohmian mechanics and the\nCopenhagen interpretation a la Landau-Lifshitz, in which classical variables\nare explicitly appended. I try to explain why the consistent histories\nformulation is scientifically problematic, in that it is a very weak theory,\nbut also scientifically interesting, shedding new light on quantum theory.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/9511032",
    "authors": [
      "Adrian Kent"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "Published in ``Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An\n  Appraisal\u0027\u0027, J. Cushing, A. Fine and S. Goldstein (eds), Kluwer Academic\n  Press (Dordrecht, 1996), pp. 343-352",
    "title": "Remarks on Consistent Histories and Bohmian Mechanics",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9511032"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "421bea5e-60d3-4662-8cb7-2dfbbfe4f6bd",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}