{
  "annotation_id": "d8c64227-1e25-49b4-8a2d-d5005e24c908",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:52.558000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:52.558000Z",
  "file_hash": "529e17c8af0d10a6426e2094f3e446b5f83401df8082e8ae9cd7b81b50f58658",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Mermin states in a recent paper that his nontechnical version of Bell\u0027s\ntheorem stands and is not invalidated by time and setting dependent instrument\nparameters as claimed in one of our previous papers. We identify a number of\nmisinterpretations (of our definitions) and mathematical inconsistencies in\nMermin\u0027s paper and show that Mermin\u0027s conclusions are therefore not valid: his\nproof does not go forward if certain possible time dependencies are taken into\naccount.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0207110",
    "authors": [
      "Karl Hess",
      "Walter Philipp"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Comment on Mermin\u0027s Recent Proof of the Theorem of Bell",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0207110"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "d2f7b97f-86fb-447a-80c5-b878f79dadb1",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}