{
  "annotation_id": "d8124039-4523-433a-9572-208b09bcc557",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:37.523000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:37.523000Z",
  "file_hash": "0e00d558ee5950c92289ca582d937369f24d1e3648f76cce47c6ea3bd61c8cdd",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "An inequality is deduced from Einstein\u0027s locality and a supplementary\nassumption. This inequality defines an experiment which can actually be\nperformed with present technology to test local realism. Quantum mechanics\nviolate this inequality a factor of 1.5. In contrast, quantum mechanics\nviolates previous inequalities (for example, Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt\ninequality of 1969, Freedman-Clauser inequality of 1972, Clauser-Horne\ninequality of 1974) by a factor of $\\sqrt 2$. Thus the magnitude of violation\nof the inequality derived in this paper is approximately $20.7%$ larger than\nthe magnitude of violation of previous inequalities. This result can be\nparticularly important for the experimental test of locality.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/9701032",
    "authors": [
      "M. Ardehali"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevA.57.114",
    "title": "Does Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Correlation or Freedman-Clauser   Correlation lead to the largest violation of Bell\u0027s Inequality?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9701032"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "a5906a04-6bfe-4802-b72c-eca5abb1266e",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}