{
  "annotation_id": "d609d6e3-48d1-4f9a-95a3-43f6d5f1b8c7",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:52.992000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:52.992000Z",
  "file_hash": "bd97ef28e6c3f0177f92a738f52e8743992c6bbf2fb5030eda3860ccffbe63b4",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We discuss a class of proofs of Bell-type inequalities that are based on\ntables of potential outcomes. These proofs state in essence: if one can only\nimagine (or write down in a table) the potential outcome of a hidden parameter\nmodel for EPR experiments then a contradiction to experiment and quantum\nmechanics follows. We show that these proofs do not contain hidden variables\nthat relate to time or, if they do, lead to logical contradictions that render\nthem invalid.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0206046",
    "authors": [
      "Karl Hess",
      "Walter Philipp"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Logical Inconsistencies in Proofs of the Theorem of Bell",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0206046"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "1d33ceb1-04ba-4925-b525-9d58e0ff82f3",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}