{
  "annotation_id": "ccb99758-3b5b-4132-b78c-d85511db9b6a",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T17:59:57.977000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T17:59:57.977000Z",
  "file_hash": "ff0ecfb665fb8a16df085eec78a58708502f865fcb61ae9af6e365bcd0efda3a",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "In a recent paper L.G. Moretto et al [nucl-th/0208024] claim that the\nnegative heat capacities presented in our previously published paper\n\\cite{PRL2000} are \"artifacts\" coming from the use of periodic boundary\nconditions in the Lattice-Gas calculations. We stress in this comment that this\nclaim is wrong: in ref. \\cite{PRL2000} we did not use periodic boundary\nconditions and anyhow the boundary conditions are irrelevant for the\nstatistical ensemble used in \\cite{PRL2000}. The second claim of\n[nucl-th/0208024] is that, because of the Coulomb repulsion, systems \"with A\u003e60\nshould present no anomalous negative heat capacities\". We show that this\nconclusion is contradicted by exact Lattice-gas simulations including Coulomb\nforces which present negative heat capacities even for A\u003e200.",
    "arxiv_id": "nucl-th/0304058",
    "authors": [
      "F. Gulminelli",
      "Ph. Chomaz"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "nucl-th"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevC.69.069801",
    "journal_ref": "Phys.Rev. C69 (2004) 069801",
    "title": "Comment on \"Negative heat capacities and first order phase transitions   in nuclei\" by L.G. Moretto et al",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0304058"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "b641d5e5-2700-4f2c-9395-fcdf537af72c",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}