{
  "annotation_id": "c84e1673-b587-4958-8445-c7484de7e9eb",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:07.688000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:07.688000Z",
  "file_hash": "cfc3855556621faf794830cfbb88da779b7c3e7d9a79ac8a6b7b9347049a06b7",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Elliptic flow at RHIC is computed event-by-event with NeXSPheRIO. We show\nthat when symmetry of the particle distribution in relation to the reaction\nplane is assumed, as usually done in the experimental extraction of elliptic\nflow, there is a disagreement between the true and reconstructed elliptic flows\n(15-30% for $\\eta$=0, 30% for $p_\\perp$=0.5 GeV). We suggest a possible way to\ntake into account the asymmetry and get good agreement between these elliptic\nflows.",
    "arxiv_id": "nucl-th/0608067",
    "authors": [
      "R. Andrade",
      "F. Grassi",
      "Y. Hama",
      "T. Kodama",
      "O. Socolowski Jr"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "nucl-th"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.202302",
    "journal_ref": "Phys.Rev.Lett.97:202302,2006",
    "title": "On the necessity to include event-by-event fluctuations in experimental   evaluation of elliptical flow",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0608067"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "c8c3314f-ba5b-43f1-bb75-1ef5b3145a44",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}