dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaWhy wave-based classical communicators can never be totally secure?
| Authors | Laszlo B. Kish |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | physics/0610102 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0610102 |
Abstract
Recently, we proposed a classical communicator which was inspired by the Kirchhoff-loop-Johnson-like-Noise (KLJN) communicator and was claimed totally secure. Here we withdraw this claim and prove that, similarly to earlier intuitive suspicions, a wave-based classical communicator can never be totally secure.
{
"annotation_id": "c48fbec1-0668-46ad-814c-659f9be64683",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:14.927000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:14.927000Z",
"file_hash": "4aba8aeabbfab1037854740c572d0a0ebc10c03161afdef15c3fb726d9fd03cb",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "Recently, we proposed a classical communicator which was inspired by the\nKirchhoff-loop-Johnson-like-Noise (KLJN) communicator and was claimed totally\nsecure. Here we withdraw this claim and prove that, similarly to earlier\nintuitive suspicions, a wave-based classical communicator can never be totally\nsecure.",
"arxiv_id": "physics/0610102",
"authors": [
"Laszlo B. Kish"
],
"categories": [
"physics.gen-ph"
],
"title": "Why wave-based classical communicators can never be totally secure?",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0610102"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "59582992-7e33-4fbb-ba64-5abbfea9a543",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}