dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaComment on ``Strangeness enhancement in $p+A$ and S$+A$ interactions at energies near 200 $A$ GeV"
| Authors | Marek Gaździcki, Ulrich Heinz |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | nucl-th/9603006 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9603006 |
| DOI | 10.1103/PhysRevC.54.1496 |
| Journal | Phys.Rev.C54:1496-1497,1996 |
Abstract
We argue that the recent analysis of strangeness production in nuclear collisions at 200 $A$ GeV/$c$ performed by Topor Pop {\it et al.} \cite{To:95} is flawed. The conclusions are based on an erroneous interpretation of the data and the numerical model results. The term ``strangeness enhancement" is used in a misleading way.
{
"annotation_id": "c12cbe02-c0d6-4a49-8088-728e256f7026",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:15.301000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:15.301000Z",
"file_hash": "9567682d8fdf02469d85a93d5710af04a578bce3e407475736272b20222dc631",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "We argue that the recent analysis of strangeness production in nuclear\ncollisions at 200 $A$ GeV/$c$ performed by Topor Pop {\\it et al.} \\cite{To:95}\nis flawed. The conclusions are based on an erroneous interpretation of the data\nand the numerical model results. The term ``strangeness enhancement\" is used in\na misleading way.",
"arxiv_id": "nucl-th/9603006",
"authors": [
"Marek Ga\u017adzicki",
"Ulrich Heinz"
],
"categories": [
"nucl-th"
],
"doi": "10.1103/PhysRevC.54.1496",
"journal_ref": "Phys.Rev.C54:1496-1497,1996",
"title": "Comment on ``Strangeness enhancement in $p+A$ and S$+A$ interactions at energies near 200 $A$ GeV\"",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9603006"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "994aee30-02ef-442e-9f2a-f4dc15c5c293",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}