dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaRemarks on the Delta(+) mass
| Authors | Ron Workman |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | nucl-th/9705021 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9705021 |
| DOI | 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.1645 |
| Journal | Phys.Rev.C56:1645-1646,1997 |
Abstract
We question the reliability of current estimates for the Delta(+) mass. We explain why the standard value, determined from pion photoproduction, should not be used in conjunction with present estimates for the Delta(++) and Delta(0) masses, determined from pion-nucleon scattering. The resultant mass splittings are internally inconsistent. We also briefly comment on discrepancies found when `theoretical' and `experimental' values for the Delta masses are compared.
{
"annotation_id": "c0693070-fc39-4121-8594-0098f8bbfcf7",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:18.955000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:18.955000Z",
"file_hash": "c3a9f97a297dfff2749db78cefe05ad536d449bb3dba51445ed4f15c58e40abd",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "We question the reliability of current estimates for the Delta(+) mass. We\nexplain why the standard value, determined from pion photoproduction, should\nnot be used in conjunction with present estimates for the Delta(++) and\nDelta(0) masses, determined from pion-nucleon scattering. The resultant mass\nsplittings are internally inconsistent. We also briefly comment on\ndiscrepancies found when `theoretical\u0027 and `experimental\u0027 values for the Delta\nmasses are compared.",
"arxiv_id": "nucl-th/9705021",
"authors": [
"Ron Workman"
],
"categories": [
"nucl-th"
],
"doi": "10.1103/PhysRevC.56.1645",
"journal_ref": "Phys.Rev.C56:1645-1646,1997",
"title": "Remarks on the Delta(+) mass",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9705021"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "eac0244d-f5a0-4e32-8c5f-1feb76859aaa",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}