dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaLearning about Treatment Effects with Prior Studies: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach
| Authors | Frederico Finan, Demian Pouzo |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | 2601.09888vv1 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09888 |
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
Abstract
We establish concentration rates for estimation of treatment effects in experiments that incorporate prior sources of information -- such as past pilots, related studies, or expert assessments -- whose external validity is uncertain. Each source is modeled as a Gaussian prior with its own mean and precision, and sources are combined using Bayesian model averaging (BMA), allowing data from the new experiment to update posterior weights. To capture empirically relevant settings in which prior studies may be as informative as the current experiment, we introduce a nonstandard asymptotic framework in which prior precisions grow with the experiment's sample size. In this regime, posterior weights are governed by an external-validity index that depends jointly on a source's bias and information content: biased sources are exponentially downweighted, while unbiased sources dominate. When at least one source is unbiased, our procedure concentrates on the unbiased set and achieves faster convergence than relying on new data alone. When all sources are biased, including a deliberately conservative (diffuse) prior guarantees robustness and recovers the standard convergence rate.
{
"annotation_id": "bc41bb89-bd1d-443a-aa66-d2120fff1182",
"date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:24.321000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:24.321000Z",
"file_hash": "cead4b64b0005c108d2ee2dc27f9c3373af94c722a65e464a0d56fb8b4f10eff",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "We establish concentration rates for estimation of treatment effects in experiments that incorporate prior sources of information -- such as past pilots, related studies, or expert assessments -- whose external validity is uncertain. Each source is modeled as a Gaussian prior with its own mean and precision, and sources are combined using Bayesian model averaging (BMA), allowing data from the new experiment to update posterior weights. To capture empirically relevant settings in which prior studies may be as informative as the current experiment, we introduce a nonstandard asymptotic framework in which prior precisions grow with the experiment\u0027s sample size. In this regime, posterior weights are governed by an external-validity index that depends jointly on a source\u0027s bias and information content: biased sources are exponentially downweighted, while unbiased sources dominate. When at least one source is unbiased, our procedure concentrates on the unbiased set and achieves faster convergence than relying on new data alone. When all sources are biased, including a deliberately conservative (diffuse) prior guarantees robustness and recovers the standard convergence rate.",
"arxiv_id": "2601.09888",
"authors": [
"Frederico Finan",
"Demian Pouzo"
],
"categories": [
"econ.EM",
"math.ST",
"stat.TH"
],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/",
"title": "Learning about Treatment Effects with Prior Studies: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09888",
"version": "v1"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "f8bf7125-00b5-469b-9850-bbf66db919a9",
"id": "arXiv Dataset",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}