dorsal/arxiv
View Schema|0>|1>+|1>|0>
| Authors | S. J. van Enk |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/0507189 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0507189 |
| DOI | 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.064306 |
| Journal | Phys. Rev. A 72, 064306 (2005) |
Abstract
I give a simple argument that demonstrates that the state |0>|1>+|1>|0>, with |0> denoting a state with 0 particles and |1> a 1-particle state, is entangled in spite of recent claims to the contrary. I also discuss new viewpoints on the old controversy about whether the above state can be said to display single-particle or single-photon nonlocality.
{
"annotation_id": "b8f94620-50c1-4d72-8d6f-b1c0d13fe14d",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:19.339000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:19.339000Z",
"file_hash": "1b9dcac896cc31eb4dc04f06f280d22cfdaeb3f64706f5c686444ad294e56029",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "I give a simple argument that demonstrates that the state |0\u003e|1\u003e+|1\u003e|0\u003e, with\n|0\u003e denoting a state with 0 particles and |1\u003e a 1-particle state, is entangled\nin spite of recent claims to the contrary. I also discuss new viewpoints on the\nold controversy about whether the above state can be said to display\nsingle-particle or single-photon nonlocality.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0507189",
"authors": [
"S. J. van Enk"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph"
],
"doi": "10.1103/PhysRevA.72.064306",
"journal_ref": "Phys. Rev. A 72, 064306 (2005)",
"title": "|0\u003e|1\u003e+|1\u003e|0\u003e",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0507189"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "fd02f141-9b4d-4dd0-9a38-e9920259f164",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}