{
  "annotation_id": "b71d8f36-c7a2-416c-baba-b6f3e270710e",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:00.916000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:00.916000Z",
  "file_hash": "2c12e5d2c045f024316b9ed5b3a25a0ba6de6f0c50bbbb747749a6b8ccce0ad6",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The formal structure of quantum electrodynamics consists of various elements.\nThese include the Schroedinger equation which evolves the system forward in\ntime, the vacuum state which is assumed to be the state with a free field\nenergy of zero, and the principle of gauge invariance. In this paper we will\nexamine the mathematical consistency of these elements. It will be shown that\nthese elements, which are basic to the formal structure of the theory, are not\nmathematically consistent.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0509064",
    "authors": [
      "Dan Solomon"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.gen-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Is formal QED mathematically consistent?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0509064"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "c9c8d044-5fec-4483-b587-1fa53a38f89f",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}