{
  "annotation_id": "aef00d3c-3a8e-45bd-9100-dbfa2b7c1af6",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:07.593000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:07.593000Z",
  "file_hash": "722e0e8ae7f0190e5d728d6eeddd5124f2832978e20d8572fa23c6794478db98",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "This article aims to show the weakness of the current scientific assessments,\nbased on a set of contradictory pseudo-axioms. The six pseudo-axioms are deeply\nanalysed. From the analysis are derived several conclusions. In spite of the\nserious efforts of the scientists to establish a ranking of honors in order to\nget funds or to control the academic and higher education institutions, the\nScience doesn\u0027t exists in itself, but different kinds of knowledge. Therefore,\nthe scientists don\u0027t control the Science; they are mere experts in a field of\nknowledge, which could be expressed in many valid ways. This variety determines\nthe existence of many models of academic curricula, based on heterogeneous ways\nof valuation that change along the History.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0602167",
    "authors": [
      "Jose Carlos Bermejo Barrera"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.soc-ph"
    ],
    "title": "The Weakness of the Scientific Assessments: A Praise of Silence",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0602167"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "37167031-7e81-4da2-bf60-a0fb6de9d0b8",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}