{
  "annotation_id": "a9422765-b411-44b5-8acc-42777af35442",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:10.242000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:10.242000Z",
  "file_hash": "cdea155235e9f546ce831c71601f89f0912cf7f1407a6fb7c3fd86a824a876d5",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "A new formulation of the EPR argument is presented, one which uses John\nBell\u0027s mathematically precise local causality condition in place of the looser\nlocality assumption which was used in the original EPR paper and on which Niels\nBohr seems to have based his objection to the EPR argument. The new formulation\nof EPR bears a striking resemblance to Bell\u0027s derivation of his famous\ninequalities. The relation between these two arguments -- in particular, the\nrole of EPR as part one of Bell\u0027s two-part argument for nonlocality -- is also\ndiscussed in detail.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0408105",
    "authors": [
      "Travis Norsen"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph",
      "physics.hist-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1063/1.2219369",
    "journal_ref": "AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 844, \"Are there quantum jumps?\n  and On the present status of quantum mechanics,\" 281-93, 2006",
    "title": "EPR and Bell Locality",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0408105"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "c34b8166-e3b2-41d6-93f4-f2dbf138a6a5",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}