{
  "annotation_id": "a8042bff-fb73-4da4-83cd-5db39e3613f7",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:06.400000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:06.400000Z",
  "file_hash": "e559baa03c4dddd734955175760552ca069b95f680b66d3249aabb2d5661bdea",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "An experiment proposed by Karl Popper is considered by many to be a crucial\ntest of quantum mechanics. Although many loopholes in the original proposal\nhave been pointed out, they are not crucial to the test. We use only the\nstandard interpretation of quantum mechanics to point out what is fundamentally\nwrong with the proposal, and demonstrate that Popper\u0027s basic premise was\nfaulty.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0405057",
    "authors": [
      "Tabish Qureshi"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1119/1.1866098",
    "journal_ref": "Am. J. Phys. 73 (6) (2005) 541-544",
    "title": "Understanding Popper\u0027s Experiment",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0405057"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "5bb46fed-cf66-4882-8b4d-e1efdaa92867",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}