dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaRESOLUTION OF A ``RETRODICTION PARADOX''
| Authors | Y. Aharonov, L. Vaidman |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/9501002 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9501002 |
Abstract
It is shown that the ``retrodiction paradox'' recently introduced by Peres arises not because of the fallacy of the time-symmetric approach as he claimed, but due to an inappropriate usage of retrodiction.
{
"annotation_id": "a36ff018-6c2c-4105-bc2b-23ab8f9d7d00",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:38.175000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:38.175000Z",
"file_hash": "63b0e766c05fce1e446d16e7439b62100bf815d31421fd36b5973e6f76f60675",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "It is shown that the ``retrodiction paradox\u0027\u0027 recently introduced by Peres\narises not because of the fallacy of the time-symmetric approach as he claimed,\nbut due to an inappropriate usage of retrodiction.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/9501002",
"authors": [
"Y. Aharonov",
"L. Vaidman"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph"
],
"title": "RESOLUTION OF A ``RETRODICTION PARADOX\u0027\u0027",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9501002"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "f8c33e8a-0394-43e8-84bf-8f782e46ca1d",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}