{
  "annotation_id": "a1d32f97-02c3-4c88-90f5-678c2505ef7e",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:42.318000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:42.318000Z",
  "file_hash": "e19f28aac34731ed6cd8759452e1b52ff64880ed223242f4b46285550e7a3717",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Recent work on Bohr\u0027s reply to EPR has helped improve our understanding of\nBohr\u0027s reply, but further work is needed. In this paper I do two things towards\nthat end. First, I make some elementary points about EPR\u0027s argument, which help\nto clear the air of some minor criticisms of Bohr\u0027s reply. Second, I argue that\nBohr\u0027s thought experiment is a reasonable realization of EPR\u0027s argument, and I\nbriefly suggest how to understand that experiment. I finish with a brief remark\nabout Bohm\u0027s version of the experiment, and its relation to Bohr\u0027s.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0102053",
    "authors": [
      "Michael Dickson"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "The EPR Experiment: A Prelude to Bohr\u0027s Reply to EPR",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0102053"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "9d532f3f-15f3-4fad-9420-bf54865e3cf8",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}