{
  "annotation_id": "a0f0b3a9-52b3-4b5b-ba28-859ec6659157",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:37.946000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:37.946000Z",
  "file_hash": "f341ed69cd02c725512813b6ad42d6232c224bf474734629b90e14ac25734868",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Liquid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques have produced some\nspectacular successes in the construction of small quantum computers, and NMR\nis currently by far the leading technology for quantum computation. There are,\nhowever, a number of significant problems with any attempt to scale up the\ntechnology to produce computers of any useful size. While it is probable that\nsome of these will be successfully sidestepped during the next few years, it is\nunlikely that they will all be solved; thus current liquid state NMR techniques\nare unlikely to provide a viable technology for practical quantum computation.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0002085",
    "authors": [
      "J. A. Jones"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48:9/11\u003c909::AID-PROP909\u003e3.0.CO;2-2",
    "journal_ref": "Fort. der Physik 48, 909-924 (2000)",
    "title": "NMR Quantum Computation: a Critical Evaluation",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0002085"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "7d1b6f1e-58f7-4852-a8e7-13f6df4ee706",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}