{
  "annotation_id": "99c6e750-7daf-43ca-a22d-3158d3445a9b",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:01.599000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:01.599000Z",
  "file_hash": "4ac18325eabee1978ef3b6dbfdeceb7c943fb10364391aff4c2bef15f8db3c7f",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Kopeliovich\u0027s suggestion [nucl-th/0306044] to perform nuclear geometry\n(Glauber) calculations using different cross sections according to the\nexperimental configuration is quite different from the standard practice of the\nlast 20 years and leads to a different nuclear geometry definition for each\nexperiment. The standard procedure for experimentalists is to perform the\nnuclear geometry calculation using the total inelastic N-N cross section, which\nresults in a common nuclear geometry definition for all experiments. The\nincomplete acceptance of individual experiments is taken into account by\ncorrecting the detector response for the probability of measuring zero for an\ninelastic collision, which can often be determined experimentally. This clearly\nseparates experimental issues such as different acceptances from theoretical\nissues which should apply in general to all experiments. Extreme-Independent\nmodels are used to illustrate the conditions for which the two methods give\nconsistent or inconsistent results.",
    "arxiv_id": "nucl-th/0403008",
    "authors": [
      "M. J. Tannenbaum"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "nucl-th"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevC.69.064902",
    "journal_ref": "Phys.Rev. C69 (2004) 064902",
    "title": "Acceptance Corrections and Extreme-Independent Models in Relativistic   Heavy Ion Collisions",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0403008"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "b48d7ea5-ba50-4b5d-85d4-c1ad67f975dc",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}