dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaExperimenter's Freedom in Bell's Theorem and Quantum Cryptography
| Authors | Johannes Kofler, Tomasz Paterek, Caslav Brukner |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/0510167 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0510167 |
| DOI | 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022104 |
| Journal | Phys. Rev. A 73, 022104 (2006) |
Abstract
Bell's theorem states that no local realistic explanation of quantum mechanical predictions is possible, in which the experimenter has a freedom to choose between different measurement settings. Within a local realistic picture the violation of Bell's inequalities can only be understood if this freedom is denied. We determine the minimal degree to which the experimenter's freedom has to be abandoned, if one wants to keep such a picture and be in agreement with the experiment. Furthermore, the freedom in choosing experimental arrangements may be considered as a resource, since its lacking can be used by an eavesdropper to harm the security of quantum communication. We analyze the security of quantum key distribution as a function of the (partial) knowledge the eavesdropper has about the future choices of measurement settings which are made by the authorized parties (e.g. on the basis of some quasi-random generator). We show that the equivalence between the violation of Bell's inequality and the efficient extraction of a secure key - which exists for the case of complete freedom (no setting knowledge) - is lost unless one adapts the bound of the inequality according to this lack of freedom.
{
"annotation_id": "955ac927-292c-4716-85ef-f08ddd48b107",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:20.538000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:20.538000Z",
"file_hash": "6c94242871f54e1da86dffb573de023ca55bb0f4a77de36a35313dc04f4c1183",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "Bell\u0027s theorem states that no local realistic explanation of quantum\nmechanical predictions is possible, in which the experimenter has a freedom to\nchoose between different measurement settings. Within a local realistic picture\nthe violation of Bell\u0027s inequalities can only be understood if this freedom is\ndenied. We determine the minimal degree to which the experimenter\u0027s freedom has\nto be abandoned, if one wants to keep such a picture and be in agreement with\nthe experiment. Furthermore, the freedom in choosing experimental arrangements\nmay be considered as a resource, since its lacking can be used by an\neavesdropper to harm the security of quantum communication. We analyze the\nsecurity of quantum key distribution as a function of the (partial) knowledge\nthe eavesdropper has about the future choices of measurement settings which are\nmade by the authorized parties (e.g. on the basis of some quasi-random\ngenerator). We show that the equivalence between the violation of Bell\u0027s\ninequality and the efficient extraction of a secure key - which exists for the\ncase of complete freedom (no setting knowledge) - is lost unless one adapts the\nbound of the inequality according to this lack of freedom.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0510167",
"authors": [
"Johannes Kofler",
"Tomasz Paterek",
"Caslav Brukner"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph"
],
"doi": "10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022104",
"journal_ref": "Phys. Rev. A 73, 022104 (2006)",
"title": "Experimenter\u0027s Freedom in Bell\u0027s Theorem and Quantum Cryptography",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0510167"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "49fc0aff-6897-4b0f-a005-5e8fa51a1207",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}