dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaThe Linear Momentum as a Tensor Function
| Authors | Enrique Ordaz Romay |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | physics/0303104 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0303104 |
Abstract
At present, whenever we work in newtonian mechanics we consider momentum to be a three-dimensional vector or a 4-dimensional one when we work in relativistic mechanics. However, this mathematical vector model has barely 200 years and its complete installation in the physics is hardly more than 100 years old. In classical mechanics, based on point particles with mass, momentum is considered as a vector because the speed of the particle is applied on a single point and the mass is defined only at that point. When the extension to classical rigid solids is made, that is, to solids that keep their shape, being so that the speed is defined to be the same for each and every point where the solid is defined, then the viewpoint of momentum as a vector is the simplest and more convenient approach. Relativity (restricted and general) was developed in the decades of 1900 and 1910 and quantum mechanics in the decades of 1920 and 1930. Relativity then impedes the existence of classical rigid solids. The maximum speed for the transmission of signals prevents a body from varying its status without being deformed. On the other hand, quantum physics breaks up with the concept of point particles with mass, substituting this model for the one of the wave function defined in an extensive region of the space (space-time in the quantum relativity). Can we really define, the moment of a relativistic solid or of a wave function with a simple vector?
{
"annotation_id": "9449651d-07d0-4386-8007-02453193df27",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:42.342000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:42.342000Z",
"file_hash": "b857fc9e50d80f764e077f0fc8a04016fa4484b8d8072f23f7100abae7f84d31",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "At present, whenever we work in newtonian mechanics we consider momentum to\nbe a three-dimensional vector or a 4-dimensional one when we work in\nrelativistic mechanics. However, this mathematical vector model has barely 200\nyears and its complete installation in the physics is hardly more than 100\nyears old. In classical mechanics, based on point particles with mass, momentum\nis considered as a vector because the speed of the particle is applied on a\nsingle point and the mass is defined only at that point. When the extension to\nclassical rigid solids is made, that is, to solids that keep their shape, being\nso that the speed is defined to be the same for each and every point where the\nsolid is defined, then the viewpoint of momentum as a vector is the simplest\nand more convenient approach. Relativity (restricted and general) was developed\nin the decades of 1900 and 1910 and quantum mechanics in the decades of 1920\nand 1930. Relativity then impedes the existence of classical rigid solids. The\nmaximum speed for the transmission of signals prevents a body from varying its\nstatus without being deformed. On the other hand, quantum physics breaks up\nwith the concept of point particles with mass, substituting this model for the\none of the wave function defined in an extensive region of the space\n(space-time in the quantum relativity). Can we really define, the moment of a\nrelativistic solid or of a wave function with a simple vector?",
"arxiv_id": "physics/0303104",
"authors": [
"Enrique Ordaz Romay"
],
"categories": [
"physics.gen-ph",
"physics.ed-ph"
],
"title": "The Linear Momentum as a Tensor Function",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0303104"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "982b031b-e7d1-4356-badd-3cc7f2795a74",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}