{
  "annotation_id": "92689ef9-a021-4e52-9c6c-a9a4f7d79230",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:43.060000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:43.060000Z",
  "file_hash": "cddc9ca26d150c42ea7e9b1c6eee2e20cd5d1d06a78ab51d080588e7422abc79",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Classical, Quantum and Relativistic mechanics elect time and space as\nfundamentals, extracting the measure of motion -velocity- from this static\nspace-time platform. Conversely, the timelessness of Statistical mechanics\ncomputes the physical flow as an evolution of (dynamical) states which, at the\nend, comes to be what would be denoted as time. Moreover, the general structure\nof mechanics is such that the notion of observability is mixed up with that of\nmeasurability. In such a context, ignoring the distinction between \"observable\nentities\" and \"measurable quantities\", and projecting dynamical objects on a\nstatic background, the measured value of physical entities is taken as the true\nor real value of the entity. This contribution emphasises this distinction,\ncorrelating the concepts of \"real values\" and \"experimental values\" and\nindicating that motion is always underestimated in the spatiotemporal platform;\nfollowing a gauge transformation, an argument centred on measurability favours\na relational \"non-relativistic\" formulation, with potentially analogous\npredictions.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0212069",
    "authors": [
      "Roberto Assumpcao"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.gen-ph",
      "physics.class-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Quadrimechanica \"Motion:observation and detection\"",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0212069"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "d0f2c0a9-462e-4365-9877-23132b110312",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}