{
  "annotation_id": "8f4216f6-b880-4896-b4b2-4368338a3880",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:37.787000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:37.787000Z",
  "file_hash": "520d9b85709a3e793fd52b954cb9f50905fc2be0c7c02221180afb9a182b43b0",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We contest the recent claim by C. Eberlein (Physical Review Letters 76 (1996)\n3842) that sonoluminescence may be explained in terms of quantum vacuum\nradiation. Due to fundamental physical limitations on bubble surface velocity,\nthe predicted number of photons per flash is indeed much smaller than unity.\nTherefore, quantum vacuum radiation cannot be considered as an explanation of\nthe observed sonoluminescence phenomenon.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/9607016",
    "authors": [
      "Astrid Lambrecht",
      "Marc-Thierry Jaekel",
      "Serge Reynaud"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2267",
    "journal_ref": "Phys.Rev.Lett.78:2267,1997",
    "title": "Comment on ``Sonoluminescence as Quantum Vacuum Radiation\u0027\u0027",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9607016"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "07a844f1-3277-461a-9c93-4efeacc34814",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}