{
  "annotation_id": "8d0e1dca-9e49-4c4a-ae3b-019c26b212c0",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:49.507000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:49.507000Z",
  "file_hash": "6c7e7cc79cea257605c735f926b54c59502734e9732c47614e05b7765430fea4",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We present comparative analysis of Gill-Weihs-Zeilinger-Zukowski arguments\ndirected against Hess-Philipp anti-Bell arguments. In general we support\nHess-Philipp viewpoint to the sequence of measurements in the EPR-Bohm\nexperiments as stochastic time-like process. On the other hand, we support\nGill-Weihs-Zeilinger-Zukowski arguments against the use of time-like\ncorrelations as the factor blocking the derivation of Bell-type inequalities.\nWe presented our own time-analysis of measurements in the EPR-Bohm experiments\nbased on the frequency approach to probability. Our analysis gives strong\narguments in favour of local realism. Moreover, our frequency analysis supports\nthe original EPR-idea that quantum mechnaics is not complete.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0205022",
    "authors": [
      "Andrei Khrennikov"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Comment on Hess-Philipp anti-Bell and Gill-Weihs-Zeilinger-Zukowski   anti-Hess-Philipp arguments",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0205022"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "ac3253fe-9fb8-4994-b600-5334d6e5fa9e",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}