dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaA Topos Foundation for Theories of Physics: I. Formal Languages for Physics
| Authors | A. Doering, C. J. Isham |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/0703060 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0703060 |
| DOI | 10.1063/1.2883740 |
| Journal | J.Math.Phys.49:053515,2008 |
Abstract
This paper is the first in a series whose goal is to develop a fundamentally new way of constructing theories of physics. The motivation comes from a desire to address certain deep issues that arise when contemplating quantum theories of space and time. Our basic contention is that constructing a theory of physics is equivalent to finding a representation in a topos of a certain formal language that is attached to the system. Classical physics arises when the topos is the category of sets. Other types of theory employ a different topos. In this paper we discuss two different types of language that can be attached to a system, S. The first is a propositional language, PL(S); the second is a higher-order, typed language L(S). Both languages provide deductive systems with an intuitionistic logic. The reason for introducing PL(S) is that, as shown in paper II of the series, it is the easiest way of understanding, and expanding on, the earlier work on topos theory and quantum physics. However, the main thrust of our programme utilises the more powerful language L(S) and its representation in an appropriate topos.
{
"annotation_id": "8bdfb969-2b43-45ba-86fb-7b2d5a1a18e1",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:34.703000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:34.703000Z",
"file_hash": "d107a017ea2eb05fa5b334cb72acd04e8f3bb8b74c1873601fbe920f9e2e180a",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "This paper is the first in a series whose goal is to develop a fundamentally\nnew way of constructing theories of physics. The motivation comes from a desire\nto address certain deep issues that arise when contemplating quantum theories\nof space and time. Our basic contention is that constructing a theory of\nphysics is equivalent to finding a representation in a topos of a certain\nformal language that is attached to the system. Classical physics arises when\nthe topos is the category of sets. Other types of theory employ a different\ntopos. In this paper we discuss two different types of language that can be\nattached to a system, S. The first is a propositional language, PL(S); the\nsecond is a higher-order, typed language L(S). Both languages provide deductive\nsystems with an intuitionistic logic. The reason for introducing PL(S) is that,\nas shown in paper II of the series, it is the easiest way of understanding, and\nexpanding on, the earlier work on topos theory and quantum physics. However,\nthe main thrust of our programme utilises the more powerful language L(S) and\nits representation in an appropriate topos.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0703060",
"authors": [
"A. Doering",
"C. J. Isham"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph",
"gr-qc",
"math-ph",
"math.MP"
],
"doi": "10.1063/1.2883740",
"journal_ref": "J.Math.Phys.49:053515,2008",
"title": "A Topos Foundation for Theories of Physics: I. Formal Languages for Physics",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0703060"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "8bae22f3-c679-4431-a9c3-baaaaf5299f1",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}