{
  "annotation_id": "892e488b-6798-47c3-9a37-fdbe3a9a308c",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:37.978000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:37.978000Z",
  "file_hash": "2bc61d562107048676e21176a1dc1c58a172ab26cde422176d88473af5b43e33",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Actual realisations of EPR experiments do {\\em not} demonstrate non-locality.\nA model is presented that should enable non-specialists as well as specialists\nto understand how easy it is to find realistic explanations for the\nobservations. The model also suggests new areas where realistic\n(``hidden-variable\u0027\u0027) models can give valid predictions whilst quantum\nmechanics fails. It offers straightforward explanations for some anomalies that\nAspect was unable to account for, providing perhaps the first experimental\nevidence that a hidden-variable theory can be {\\em superior} to quantum\nmechanics. The apparent success of quantum mechanics in predicting results is\nshown to be largely due to the use of unjustifiable and biased analysis of the\ndata. Data that has been discarded because it did not lead to a valid Bell\u0027s\ntest may give further evidence that hidden variables exist.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/9611037",
    "authors": [
      "Caroline H. Thompson"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1007/BF02186307",
    "journal_ref": "Found.Phys.Lett. 9 (1996) 357-382",
    "title": "The Chaotic Ball: An Intuitive Analogy for EPR Experiments",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9611037"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "e66468aa-a8b1-4563-9f50-dd6de07f5681",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}