{
  "annotation_id": "8707855f-9697-457c-9b37-4e326ff75eb8",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:34.048000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:34.048000Z",
  "file_hash": "87b17c935a4f643325c7e18172ba42a941d9689e3c853b265793e8929283cbb0",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "It is shown that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen conclusion concerning the\n`incompleteness\u0027 of Quantum Mechanics does not follow from the results of their\nproposed gedanken experiment, but is rather stated as a premise. If it were\npossible to perform the experiment it would, in fact, show that Quantum\n  Mechanics is `complete\u0027 for the observables discussed.\n  Because, however, of the non square-integrable nature of the wave function,\nthe proposed experiment gives vanishing probabilities for measurements\nperformed in finite intervals of configuration or momentum space. Hence no\nconclusion as to the `completeness\u0027, or otherwise, of Quantum Mechanics can be\ndrawn from the experiment.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0702018",
    "authors": [
      "J. H. Field"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Proof of the `Incompleteness\u0027 of Quantum   Mechanics",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0702018"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "cf6e9d2e-2db0-4808-b7fa-91cad22cbc49",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}