{
  "annotation_id": "856c496b-5707-47a2-98e5-d61bd9660f09",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:46.729000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:46.729000Z",
  "file_hash": "d634750d0eb43041fcaf70f9db2374ec9a175e9105fa086c0f1d65445ca3933b",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The Big Bang frame of work for cosmology is a theoretical construct based\nupon one possible interpretation of the Hubble observation of the red shift\nfrom distant galaxies. Almost all of the scientific experimental evidence has\nbeen interpreted under the Big-Bang hypothesis. And the results have been very\npromising though with a few important drawbacks. The main point in our present\nwork is to prove that the expansion of the Universe, the essence of the\nBig-Bang, is based upon an apparent interpretation of the distance-red shift\nrelation found by Hubble. On the contrary, an absolute interpretation as we\ngive here results in a constant size Universe, together with a shrinking\nquantum world. This is the role of Planck\u0027s constant: the red shift-distance\nrelation can be interpreted as evidence of an expanding Universe or,\nalternatively, as evidence as evidence of a shrinking quantum world due to the\ndecrease of Planck\u0027s constant with cosmological time.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0309108",
    "authors": [
      "Antonio Alfonso-Faus"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.gen-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Mass Boom Versus Big Bang: The Role of Planck\u0027s Constant",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0309108"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "120d139d-702e-4118-9257-88fa581ee7f4",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}