{
  "annotation_id": "81f9c002-7bf8-4bd1-9e44-9a6540718433",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:00:56.228000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:00:56.228000Z",
  "file_hash": "8da9ec738ece0e46068d53546216c6ba549ddae7f8853acc3db4ddf52d88e394",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We compare different actual forms of democracy and analyse in which way they\nare variations of a \u0027natural consensus decision process\u0027. We analyse how\n\u0027consensus decision followed by majority voting\u0027 is open to \u0027false play\u0027 by the\nmajority, and investigate how other types of false play appear in alternative\ntypes of democratic decision procedures. We introduce the combined notion of\n\u0027quantum parliament\u0027 and \u0027quantum decision procedure\u0027, and prove it to be the\nonly one, when applied after consensus decision, that is immune to false play.",
    "arxiv_id": "physics/0503078",
    "authors": [
      "Diederik Aerts"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.soc-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1142/9789812702043_0011",
    "journal_ref": "In D. Aerts, B. D\u0027Hooghe and N. Note (Eds.), Worldviews, Science\n  and Us, Redemarcating Knowledge and its Social and Ethical Implications.\n  Singapore: World Scientific, 2005.",
    "title": "Towards a New Democracy: Consensus Through Quantum Parliament",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0503078"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "532e4868-cee0-4565-8f85-c017405cfc7c",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}