{
  "annotation_id": "7c04d7e3-9075-43c5-91da-22757558aace",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:44.582000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:44.582000Z",
  "file_hash": "df00c5b24a37ee1d89116b8137f3194cca5fe28615e18ee2f7cd6b67fe074a60",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We reconsider the consequences of the observed violations of Bell\u0027s\ninequalities. Two common responses to these violations are: (i) the rejection\nof realism and the retention of locality, and (ii) the rejection of locality\nand the retention of realism. Here we critique response (i). We argue that\nlocality contains an implicit form of realism, since in a world view that\nembraces locality, spacetime, with its usual, fixed topology, has properties\nindependent of measurement. Hence we argue that response (i) is incomplete, in\nthat its rejection of realism is only partial.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/9807042",
    "authors": [
      "Raymond Y. Chiao",
      "John C. Garrison"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "Found.Phys. 29 (1999) 553-560",
    "title": "Realism or Locality: Which Should We Abandon?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9807042"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "d910b770-862c-40a8-aa77-32c320590dd2",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}