{
  "annotation_id": "7919294d-9aff-4a92-ad10-b596af5a092c",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:42.642000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:42.642000Z",
  "file_hash": "e1034940233506d93b8bf67b1e035eb44a165eaa7665620b8227382900fa7cd8",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "This is an attempt to apply Nagel\u0027s distinction between internal and external\nstatements to the interpretation of quantum mechanics. I propose that this\ndistinction resolves the contradiction between unitary evolution and the\nprojection postulate. I also propose a more empirically realistic version of\nthe projection postulate. The result is a version of Everett\u0027s relative-state\ninterpretation, including a proposal for how probabilities are to be\nunderstood.\n  Based on a talk given at the 9th UK Foundations of Physics meeting in\nBirmingham on 12 September 2000.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0011084",
    "authors": [
      "Anthony Sudbery"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Why am I me? and why is my world so classical?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0011084"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "78c6b593-c1e4-44ac-a9f3-d71ba91c2563",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}