dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaComment on "Classical interventions in quantum systems II. Relativistic invariance"
| Authors | H. Nikolic |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/0109120 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0109120 |
| DOI | 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.066101 |
| Journal | Phys.Rev.A64:066101,2001 |
Abstract
In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. A 61, 022117 (2000)], quant-ph/9906034, A. Peres argued that quantum mechanics is consistent with special relativity by proposing that the operators that describe time evolution do not need to transform covariantly, although the measurable quantities need to transform covariantly. We discuss the weaknesses of this proposal.
{
"annotation_id": "78bb9d4a-0c49-4c6d-9396-c1de97316f5c",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:45.792000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:45.792000Z",
"file_hash": "7f06afb1b95f13ded7812f1399340449aaf0969262d7ee0fc260ea9a16a1d20d",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. A 61, 022117 (2000)], quant-ph/9906034, A.\nPeres argued that quantum mechanics is consistent with special relativity by\nproposing that the operators that describe time evolution do not need to\ntransform covariantly, although the measurable quantities need to transform\ncovariantly. We discuss the weaknesses of this proposal.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0109120",
"authors": [
"H. Nikolic"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph"
],
"doi": "10.1103/PhysRevA.64.066101",
"journal_ref": "Phys.Rev.A64:066101,2001",
"title": "Comment on \"Classical interventions in quantum systems II. Relativistic invariance\"",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0109120"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "28d64ca2-f629-4d52-b969-48d5eb26d37c",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}