{
  "annotation_id": "78bb9d4a-0c49-4c6d-9396-c1de97316f5c",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:45.792000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:45.792000Z",
  "file_hash": "7f06afb1b95f13ded7812f1399340449aaf0969262d7ee0fc260ea9a16a1d20d",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. A 61, 022117 (2000)], quant-ph/9906034, A.\nPeres argued that quantum mechanics is consistent with special relativity by\nproposing that the operators that describe time evolution do not need to\ntransform covariantly, although the measurable quantities need to transform\ncovariantly. We discuss the weaknesses of this proposal.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0109120",
    "authors": [
      "H. Nikolic"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevA.64.066101",
    "journal_ref": "Phys.Rev.A64:066101,2001",
    "title": "Comment on \"Classical interventions in quantum systems II. Relativistic   invariance\"",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0109120"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "28d64ca2-f629-4d52-b969-48d5eb26d37c",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}