{
  "annotation_id": "76a0c608-71ea-4d98-909e-cab5126743c0",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:31.149000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:31.149000Z",
  "file_hash": "477949957b0a89171c272422372c9f7369b87c9dd696b7e78aecfe8794c89b59",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "In a one-off Minority game, when a group of players agree to collaborate they\ngain an advantage over the remaining players. We consider the advantage\nobtained in a quantum Minority game by a coalition sharing an initially\nentangled state versus that obtained by a coalition that uses classical\ncommunication to arrive at an optimal group strategy. In a model of the quantum\nMinority game where the final measurement basis is randomized, quantum\ncoalitions outperform classical ones when carried out by up to four players,\nbut an unrestricted amount of classical communication is better for larger\ncoalition sizes.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0608096",
    "authors": [
      "Adrian P. Flitney",
      "Andrew D. Greentree"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1016/j.physleta.2006.10.007",
    "journal_ref": "Phys. Lett. A 362 (2007) 132--137",
    "title": "Coalitions in the quantum Minority game: classical cheats and quantum   bullies",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0608096"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "d9282302-3847-4eac-b431-0ad757c7a832",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}