{
  "annotation_id": "71bbe7bd-3782-41b8-a62e-d16d245347a2",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:48.888000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:48.888000Z",
  "file_hash": "07e2beb6e778e732736716bcc675b6fb02c12bd54ea256b22120d19b0528a020",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We investigate the differences between distributing entanglement using star\nand ring type network topologies. Assuming symmetrically distributed users, we\nasses the relative merits of the two network topologies as a function of the\nnumber of users when the amount of resources and the type of the quantum\nchannel are kept fixed. For limited resources, we find that the topology better\nsuited for entanglement distribution could differ from that which is more\nsuitable for classical communications.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0202116",
    "authors": [
      "A. Hutton",
      "S. Bose"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevA.66.032320",
    "title": "Comparison of Star and Ring Topologies for Entanglement Distribution",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0202116"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "17f46640-b539-420d-a93b-864cef48a530",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}