{
  "annotation_id": "712c43cc-fa91-469f-b59d-c47949e7f9ae",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:24.007000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:24.007000Z",
  "file_hash": "2b19c0c90fb2a069cb397836c27e7de46508ad6b6d94c81512e9bd8410d81460",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "The concept of decoherence is defined, and discussed in a historical context.\nThis is illustrated by some of its essential consequences which may be relevant\nfor the interpretation of quantum theory. Various aspects of the formalism are\nalso reviewed for this purpose.\n  Contents: 1. Definition of concepts. 2. Roots in nuclear physics. 3. The\nquantum-to-classical transition. 4. Quantum mechanics without observables. 5.\nRules versus tools. 6. Nonlocality. 7. Information loss (paradox?). 8. Dynamics\nof entanglement. 9. Irreversibility. 10. Concluding remarks.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0512078",
    "authors": [
      "H. D. Zeh"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph",
      "cond-mat.mes-hall",
      "gr-qc",
      "nucl-th"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "Quantum Decoherence, Duplantier, B., Raimond, J.-M., and\n  Rivasseau, V., edts. (Birkh\\\"auser, 2006), p. 151-175",
    "title": "Roots and Fruits of Decoherence",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0512078"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "b3a8813f-da89-46e5-8e09-cf12d1097896",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}