dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaLRAS: Advanced Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search
| Authors | Yujin Zhou, Chuxue Cao, Jinluan Yang, Lijun Wu, Conghui He, Sirui Han, Yike Guo |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | 2601.07296vv1 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07296 |
| License | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ |
Abstract
While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated exceptional logical capabilities in mathematical domains, their application to the legal field remains hindered by the strict requirements for procedural rigor and adherence to legal logic. Existing legal LLMs, which rely on "closed-loop reasoning" derived solely from internal parametric knowledge, frequently suffer from lack of self-awareness regarding their knowledge boundaries, leading to confident yet incorrect conclusions. To address this challenge, we present Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search (LRAS), the first framework designed to transition legal LLMs from static and parametric "closed-loop thinking" to dynamic and interactive "Active Inquiry". By integrating Introspective Imitation Learning and Difficulty-aware Reinforcement Learning, LRAS enables LRMs to identify knowledge boundaries and handle legal reasoning complexity. Empirical results demonstrate that LRAS outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 8.2-32\%, with the most substantial gains observed in tasks requiring deep reasoning with reliable knowledge. We will release our data and models for further exploration soon.
{
"annotation_id": "70703839-1c3e-42eb-9584-308dbc6cc215",
"date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:12.655000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:12.655000Z",
"file_hash": "8586df8a48b8868d8b3041f815e69d669f9a25a3f1133c6377c941931f7e3a16",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated exceptional logical capabilities in mathematical domains, their application to the legal field remains hindered by the strict requirements for procedural rigor and adherence to legal logic. Existing legal LLMs, which rely on \"closed-loop reasoning\" derived solely from internal parametric knowledge, frequently suffer from lack of self-awareness regarding their knowledge boundaries, leading to confident yet incorrect conclusions. To address this challenge, we present Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search (LRAS), the first framework designed to transition legal LLMs from static and parametric \"closed-loop thinking\" to dynamic and interactive \"Active Inquiry\". By integrating Introspective Imitation Learning and Difficulty-aware Reinforcement Learning, LRAS enables LRMs to identify knowledge boundaries and handle legal reasoning complexity. Empirical results demonstrate that LRAS outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 8.2-32\\%, with the most substantial gains observed in tasks requiring deep reasoning with reliable knowledge. We will release our data and models for further exploration soon.",
"arxiv_id": "2601.07296",
"authors": [
"Yujin Zhou",
"Chuxue Cao",
"Jinluan Yang",
"Lijun Wu",
"Conghui He",
"Sirui Han",
"Yike Guo"
],
"categories": [
"cs.AI",
"cs.CL"
],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"title": "LRAS: Advanced Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07296",
"version": "v1"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "5dcefddb-278b-4803-a080-98a17a533893",
"id": "arXiv Dataset",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}