{
  "annotation_id": "6ca35b83-089f-4148-9d6e-a33b7b511431",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:09.062000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:09.062000Z",
  "file_hash": "acb8dc4989ace46486e7241e86537c1a5dbafe952e1cbe3cf26800c133db5790",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We review both the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (EPR) paper about the\ncompleteness of quantum theory, and Schrodinger\u0027s responses to the EPR paper.\nWe find that both the EPR paper and Schrodinger\u0027s responses, including the cat\nparadox, are not consistent with the current understanding of quantum theory\nand thermodynamics.\n  Because both the EPR paper and Schrodinger\u0027s responses play a leading role in\ndiscussions of the fascinating and promising fields of quantum computation and\nquantum information, we hope our review will be helpful to researchers in these\nfields.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0406164",
    "authors": [
      "Elias P. Gyftopoulos",
      "Michael R. von Spakovsky"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph"
    ],
    "title": "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Are They Related to Quantum   Paradoxology?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0406164"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "9b51c357-ddc9-4a7d-b5ed-404bae47b297",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}