{
  "annotation_id": "6b0dcf1f-16f1-4c3e-970a-2e162ade87bd",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:00.145000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:00.145000Z",
  "file_hash": "feed5df1177585937d0dfae4d542a18e5dd627bea62605a869c2b67f718196e8",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "Various local hidden variables models for the singlet correlations exploit\nthe detection loophole, or other loopholes connected with post-selection on\ncoincident arrival times. I consider the connection with a probabilistic\nsimulation technique called rejection-sampling, and pose some natural questions\nconcerning what can be achieved and what cannot be achieved with local (or\ndistributed) rejection sampling. In particular a new and more serious loophole,\nwhich we call the coincidence loophole, is introduced.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0307217",
    "authors": [
      "Richard D. Gill"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph",
      "math.PR"
    ],
    "journal_ref": "pp. 269--276 in: M. Sch\"urmann and U. Franz (eds.), Quantum\n  Probability and Infinite Dimensional Analysis: from Foundations to\n  Applications. QP--PQ: Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis, Volume 18\n  (2005). World Scientific.",
    "title": "The chaotic chameleon",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0307217"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "2a652d51-21a0-431b-aa1c-b8f2e26ac5ef",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}