dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaLanguage is Physical
| Authors | Paul Benioff |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | quant-ph/0210211 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210211 |
| Journal | Quant.Inf.Proc. 1 (2002) 495-509 |
Abstract
Some aspects of the physical nature of language are discussed. In particular, physical models of language must exist that are efficiently implementable. The existence requirement is essential because without physical models no communication or thinking would be possible. Efficient implementability for creating and reading language expressions is discussed and illustrated with a quantum mechanical model. The reason for interest in language is that language expressions can have meaning, either as an informal language or as a formal language associated with a mathematical or physical theory. It is noted that any universally applicable physical theory, or coherent theory of physics and mathematics together, includes in its domain physical models of expressons for both the informal language used to discuss the theory and expressions of the theory itself. It follows that there must be formulas in the formal theory that express some of their own physical properties. Inclusion of intelligent system in the theory domain means that the theory, e.g., quantum mechanics, must describe in some sense its own validation. Maps of language expressions into physical states are discussed as are conditions under which such a map is a Godel map. The possibility that language is also mathematical is very briefly discussed.
{
"annotation_id": "6ac5552f-0276-49f2-a0b2-1b6074faaa73",
"date_created": "2026-03-02T18:01:55.724000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:01:55.724000Z",
"file_hash": "16700e2e27b0401bf580c7f1f3cb03538e9c284856eaea3183962ad6266fec34",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "Some aspects of the physical nature of language are discussed. In particular,\nphysical models of language must exist that are efficiently implementable. The\nexistence requirement is essential because without physical models no\ncommunication or thinking would be possible. Efficient implementability for\ncreating and reading language expressions is discussed and illustrated with a\nquantum mechanical model. The reason for interest in language is that language\nexpressions can have meaning, either as an informal language or as a formal\nlanguage associated with a mathematical or physical theory. It is noted that\nany universally applicable physical theory, or coherent theory of physics and\nmathematics together, includes in its domain physical models of expressons for\nboth the informal language used to discuss the theory and expressions of the\ntheory itself. It follows that there must be formulas in the formal theory that\nexpress some of their own physical properties. Inclusion of intelligent system\nin the theory domain means that the theory, e.g., quantum mechanics, must\ndescribe in some sense its own validation. Maps of language expressions into\nphysical states are discussed as are conditions under which such a map is a\nGodel map. The possibility that language is also mathematical is very briefly\ndiscussed.",
"arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0210211",
"authors": [
"Paul Benioff"
],
"categories": [
"quant-ph",
"hep-th"
],
"journal_ref": "Quant.Inf.Proc. 1 (2002) 495-509",
"title": "Language is Physical",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0210211"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "5c3cef97-f8b2-4265-b321-452c8d039385",
"id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}