{
  "annotation_id": "66aef846-a239-49fb-9776-f0727d03ed0e",
  "date_created": "2026-03-02T18:02:06.632000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-03-02T18:02:06.632000Z",
  "file_hash": "fa33bbff3fa701dbbabd956997dd15680f6fc2568db55789535c3cb5073cd8aa",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "After recalling different formulations of the definition of supersymmetric\nquantum mechanics given in the literature, we discuss the relationships between\nthem in order to provide an answer to the question raised in the title.",
    "arxiv_id": "quant-ph/0401120",
    "authors": [
      "M. Combescure",
      "F. Gieres",
      "M. Kibler"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "quant-ph",
      "hep-th",
      "math-ph",
      "math.MP"
    ],
    "doi": "10.1088/0305-4470/37/43/025",
    "journal_ref": "J.Phys. A37 (2004) 10385",
    "title": "Are N=1 and N=2 supersymmetric quantum mechanics equivalent?",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0401120"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "74d37604-8be3-464b-b756-b5da248cebed",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset IDs",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-03-01",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}